Huh. https://drewdevault.com/2025/01/16/2025-01-16-No-Billionares-at-FOSDEM-please.html
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from soatok@furry.engineer
@soatok Fuck billionaires.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from atoponce@fosstodon.org
@soatok I mean, does FOSDEM really need Dorsey's keynote? I don't think so
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from evaristegal0is@mastodon.social
@soatok Can't agree more with this point of view.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fosdembsd@bsd.cafe
@fosdembsd Yeah I was more taken aback by their selection of Dorsey instead of... any of the many thousands of people more appropriate for the venue
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from soatok@furry.engineer
@soatok @fosdembsd I wonder if he promised some kind of donation in exchange
Edit: Iβm just a dumb dumb who read the article while still half asleep in bed π
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pb4000@infosec.exchange
@pb4000 @soatok @fosdembsd Well, yeah, from the article: "Dorsey is presumably being platformed in Janson because his blockchain bullshit company is a main sponsor of FOSDEM this year."
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from unlambda@hachyderm.io
@unlambda @soatok @fosdembsd Oh duh, that didnβt click for me π€¦ thanks for pointing that out
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pb4000@infosec.exchange
@pb4000@infosec.exchange @soatok@furry.engineer @fosdembsd@mastodon.bsd.cafe The piece said that he/his company or whatever was a big sponsor this year, so that probably paid a role β:wvrnCry:β
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from senil@booping.synth.download
@senil @soatok @pb4000 @fosdembsd And people were complaining about Black Hat having bullshit sponsored talks, at least they have enough integrity to force them into explicitly sponsored talks rather than giving sponsors the main keynotes lol
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nytpu@tilde.zone
@soatok Ah, is DeVault Drew-ing a tantrum in a futile attempt to somehow stay relevant?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from zilti@gts.lyrion.ch
@zilti It looks like he's planning a sit-in to protest Dorsey speaking at FOSDEM. Not really a tantrum.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from soatok@furry.engineer
@soatok
His blog post sounds like an 8-year-old who is upset that he has to do the dishes because his sister's on a school trip.
Dude's a walking victim complex. (And a mud-slinging liar with weirdly specific targeting obsessions, though that's besides the point here)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from zilti@gts.lyrion.ch
@zilti I've not heard much of the guy over the years, so maybe I'm missing the context to infer this tone from his blog, but it just sounds like... typical FOSS activism stuff to me?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from soatok@furry.engineer
@zilti honestly I'm still surprised DeVault is still being taken seriously, especially after the time "The DeVault Report" was published (https://dmpwn.info).
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kasesag@hostux.social
@kasesag @zilti
this is scary, but at least he has the attitude to sign a letter ousting RMS, instead of the anonymous people behind this website which looks to me as a character assassination attempt targeted towards him.
and even if this is indeed him, people change over the course of 10 years.
judging by the timeline it was posted, it's irrelevant and didn't have the impact the anonymous people behind it expected it to have. 4 months later, he wasn't cancelled.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xinayder@fosstodon.org
@xinayder Oh, cool tactic to defend DeVault huh. No, he hasn't changed in the slightest, If he did then he wouldn't be so obsessed about trying to silence people like Vaxry who just want to code and nothing more. His authoritarian methods and childish whining over people not playing by his rules perfectly reflect that.
There's clear proof given there that he's behind this document, he has defended loli and also has published browser tabs over the years where he has shown such stuff present.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kasesag@hostux.social
@xinayder Also let's not forget who has started attempts to assassinate creative people like Vaxry and figures who have done a lot towards history of Free software like RMS, so trying to paint DeVault like a victim there is just retarded.
I would rather think of protecting minors from ever getting in touch with this person than trying to silence people down for not having the same opinions. Freedom 0 guarantees them freedom of expression even If I despise Dorsey he's still allowed to speak.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kasesag@hostux.social
You don't get to say "people change over the course of 10 years" when the entire basis of one of his accusations against RMS is an awkward social interaction that happened half a century ago, the evidence for which was entirely hearsay anyway. Meanwhile DeVault is literally a closet child molester, and unlike with RMS, wehave the evidence to prove it because his opsec was shit and he just put all of it out there for us to see under the same name. It only took an hour after Kiwifarms picked up on the story to uncover everything: political motives, the lies, the skeletons in the closet and all.
You can argue all you want that cmpwn didn't write The Stallman Report or the screenshotted posts, but the evidence, both hard and circumstantial, all point to him being at least one of the authors if not the sole author, of everything he's accused of putting online. The signing of the report was an opsec failure, not something done out of honesty. He tried to cover it up and still denies being the author.
All of the arguments presented within The Stallman Report are hypocritical at best and utterly fucking laughable at worst, the entire report consisted of "richard said this thing" taken out of context or intentionally misquoted to mean something else. The one thing that Richard actually said that was pretty fucked up, even Drew himself admits in the report he later walked back on, even before he got in trouble with the FSF the first time over it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bonkmaykr@canithesis.org
@soatok this is a great opportunity to organize a protest LAN party, preferably with a foss game. All you need is a couple switches, ethernet cables and some power cords, and the only real problem you have would be getting people off the stage by 12:30
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from chickfilla@tilde.zone
@chickfilla Make it a game with a definite time limit.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from soatok@furry.engineer
@soatok huh wait, fosdem let's itself sponsor by shitcoin nonsense? pain
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from karolherbst@chaos.social
@soatok no horse in this fight, but shouldn't the flight have happened when they took the sponsorship money? "Now they're just arguing about the price"
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from furicle@mastodon.social
@soatok I could not agree more with this. π
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from privacy_guru@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini