a big reason i use linux is because it gives me Control over the computer. no windows dark pattern spying shit. i can set up everything to look and function exactly how i want. but every couple months there's a package update that overrides or changes something so it no longer works how i configured it. they just reached in and broke something i worked hard on. and i have no choice in this, because you need to eventually update packages to install new ones. i don't really feel in Control at all
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jk@mastodon.social
this thing happens really often, but the latest one that happened to me this week was with desktop icons. after an update, the selection rectangle around them looks weird and different, and the icons are the wrong size, they're clipped so you can't see the icon fully or read the label. haven't attempted to fix it, will probably take at least an hour. it makes me feel like the computer isn't really mine. it belongs to a bunch of nerds who keep making weird mistakes. a kind of clumsy nerd cabal
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jk@mastodon.social
the problem isn't that updates can cause undesirable changes. that happens on every OS: windows has malevolent updates every day. the issue is that, due to the interdependent nature of software on a linux system, you are forced to update most things, most of the time, whether you like it or not, as a basic prerequisite of using the system at all. my opinion? about this design?? it's Bad! ! !
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jk@mastodon.social
i've had a hard time explaining this to linux people, it's like explaining water to a fish. they just say "security" over and over or something. they say something like "you cant do static libraries or vendor your shared objects because theres uh theres like a second hard drive usr bin usr local bin. ken and dennis ran out of disk space uhhhh . .. dynamic linking save memory.... windows insecure .... use Docker? use flatpak" or whatever
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jk@mastodon.social
imagine creating such a word salad to distract from the fact that the only tenable operating system going forward for the next few decades is "everyone runs linux, but all software that we run is in the form of Windows EXE files because even using wine or proton at least you can actually just click on them and they run"
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jk@mastodon.social
@jk you say this but the latest software to break my setup (and eat an extra gig of disk space in the process) was Wine :blobcatTears:
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from exelotl@raru.re
@jk I thought most people were on flatpacks now
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from moh_kohn@mastodon.scot
@jk cursed idea: Linux Where Everything Is Statically Linked So It Doesn't Matter
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mavica_again@computerfairi.es
@mavica_again Sounds good to me
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from annmygdala@todon.nl
@jk dont know what distribution you use but some of them bring only security updates between releases…
But i agree that some, even core software like gnome desktop /shell change often in a way that disrupts my usage behavior, without letting me see the benefit…
(and i still can’t close gnome file save dialog with ESC like all other dialogs, and when i start typing a name for the file which is displayed as marked, not the name changes but it starts to search )
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lazyb0y@mastodon.social
@jk "Clumsy nerd cabal" or "Stressed out nerd cabal" or maybe "Stressed out Clumsy nerd cabal" is probably right. But I'm curious, what distro are you on that has such problems?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from aanee@mastodon.online
@aanee @jk i think they all would? except maybe, maybe, nixos
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tbodt@mastodon.social
@tbodt @jk It depends. If the config in question is for a part of, say, gnome it's distro and even OS agnostic. That's just asshole devs. If the config is more global; /etc stuff, then it's the distro maintainers that are to blame.
Nixos fixes the /etc and library problems by ignoring the space saving goal that is at the core of dynamic libraries. Likewise does flatpak, snap, AppImages or .exe files to varying degree.
This can be solved in other ways but there is a character limit.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from aanee@mastodon.online
@jk I have been using computers for a very long time and I have never understood the developer mindset of "yay, we released a new stable version of [desktop suite]! Time to get cracking on moving all of the buttons, shortcuts, and menu settings around and changing the entire look and feel!"
I would have been perfectly happy using amiga workbench 1.3 for the rest of my life
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ItsTheManOnTheMoon@octodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini