One reason I think consensual #degrowth will be very difficult to achieve is the absolute combinatorial explosion of expressive possibility we can now see in virtually every domain of design, development and production, from beer to bikes to fashion.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from adamgreenfield@social.coop
This is orthogonal to, but obviously geared to, late capitalism’s voracious need for new markets and new regimes of extension.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from adamgreenfield@social.coop
@adamgreenfield
There’s expressive possibility, and there’s the weaponization of consumption as a solution for dissatisfaction. Given how industrial production and capitalism’s growth at all costs imperative have colonized our cultures, I’m not sure how we graceful, delicately, and urgently untangle this.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from scottmatter@aus.social
@adamgreenfield Non-consensual though - simple! We just carry on as is
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from sumek@hachyderm.io
@adamgreenfield I'm not so sure about that. Consider how after prohibition in the USA, beer was reduced to a yellow, bland commodity. Then craft brewing dug up old recipes and made new ones, eating into market share with variety. I could see a shrinking economy that still can produce variety, while capitalism tends to homogenize everything and centralize into monopoly. Like how a supermarket tomato is watery and thick-skinned so it can be trucked a thousand kilometers.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from metalfabs@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini