Toots for ciggysmokebringer@kolektiva.social account

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 23:05

The Game, but instead of a incredibly expensive ruse to trigger existential crisis out of avarice, its to trigger one out of excessive puns

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 21:55

And the split along poors and richies who are single income does not benefit a political thrust that is basically telling you to lie to yourself for some specious greater good.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 21:50

That about 25% of households are single income (hello my fellows) is exactly why all these Liberal ground levels were stupefied that their boasts of the economy fell flat.

Whatever non existent rise in wages happened, most of the single income households would only enjoy a single bump in single income against collective household purchasing need so they absolutely got fucked by inflation in a way that two or more earning households didnt.

We likely already were near full employment by dependent neccesity and gaps in employment being points of extreme stress and distress to avoid at most costs, risk adverse to opportunities that might expose us with 'last in first out' layoffs.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 20:41

The argument for is basically creating noise that is hard to sift through through so much potential out there and there being complete ringers that know theyre are ringers and dont lead back to nonringers or suck in earnest types either.

And its to basically contain focus/time/resource into a dead end so live ends can continue.

Its crude counterintel that at least lets the yahoos be yahoos instead of trying to break them into a set of procedures and mode of organizing theyll thrash against.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 20:35

I will make the argument that radioactive honeypots do have a place, but also, make the argument that a radioactive honeypot should have firewalls in place and if youre gonna waste The State's time/focus/resources being flashy on purpose, you do so alone on purpose.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 03:43

I do not think a lot of problems are

  1. People are automotons

  1. Who will act on truth

And i know this by outsides that tells the truth in a way that is so alarming and seemingly inactionable, and insiders who dont even get into the orbit of a hard truth

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-02 at 03:33

There is something about refusing to tell the truth being way more impactful than people not knowing the truth, especially if you have asserted yourself a truth teller of sorts. Not lying but refusing to admit or speak to actual condition.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-01 at 03:43

There is a vanishing point of inhabiting the better world you fight for when its below a point of possibility or the possibility requires a total redress of better world that goes lower by the day.

Like, 'oh, the thing proto revolutionaries couldnt articulate a surefire provision over in victory isnt even provided in a diminishing status quo' is more likely than 'did we lose the plot?' Especially if proto revolutionaries are losing the plot already.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-02-01 at 03:27

There is a point where 'how is it gonna work if we win' and 'did we betray the entire point' are basically so far below consideration because there is no fight possible at that scale on the horizon, or the horizon they are on requires a State so impaired that net present radicals could push it over, as if any net present QoL or any life resembling 2025 is possible in such a scenario

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 22:13

One of the things about organizing a mass sickout is that it will be impossible to keep under wraps, and part of the point is not keeping it under wraps, but if there is a date set and then warnings issued on abrupt unplanned absences on that specific day...

Now we are at the crucial inflection of line holding against showing up under threat or a lot of managers having a real shit day without resolve.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 22:05

Organizing a Mass Sickout: pssss wanna play hookie with me tomorrow?

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 07:03

Ya fuck up, what, more in prison? Not in ATC anymore labor or is airline traffic some kinda crucial thing or something?

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 06:58

Mass ATC quits has prison labor forced into it.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 06:53

Venom and Kirby should team up? Be roomies?

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 05:01

Not everyone played TF2 to contribute their best to a winning effort for the thrill and intensity of the gameplay, but like...

If you set up a server and said 'select the role you think youd contribute your best gameplay towards', 8 snipers might happen.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 04:55

This is just one Pyro Medic's opinion ofc.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 04:51

Trying to pinpoint the value of Slade as Spy is hard - 1 player can destroy a team over and over if not accounted for, but 3 players could account for him and diminish threat. So Slade is worth 3 mid players in a 12 v 12 game which is iffy trade but not bad in 16 v 16.

A player that can take out half your team is worth a quarter of your team who will not be doing better than spy management unless they go medic. A quarter of the team to protect a third of it? Sure.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 04:35

This is 90% earnest by the way, the winners when i played the hlstats traxking servers, generally had the top role players play their role like Slade as Spy, and then the rest of the team filling highest utility and team need roles. 1 pyro slowing down the best spy even if theyre kind meh pyro overall actually did help.

Anyone can play medic, and good medics with good demos/soldiers/heavies to pocket win entire games. But you gotta love playing medic to fill the role.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 04:30

Once again I am asking you to indulge TF2 as teaching tool in autonomously selected roles, with psychological and sociological analysis at forefront.

Consider the endemic 'Too Many Snipers, Not Enough Medics' problem, and just general team comp issues with role selection not meting out own aptitudes or team need.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Ciggy Bringer of Smoke on 2025-01-31 at 02:46

Its an entire precipe of significance that looms before them, and like, once crossed theyll find another to warn of invoking but all this is turns out to be 'stop making me side with the baddies because I will' and not much more.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

=> This profile with reblog | Go to ciggysmokebringer@kolektiva.social account

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/profile/109366866236812308
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
301.785658 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
8.470859 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).