@neil Maybe there's an argument here that the Act is concerned specifically with unitary service providers, and so "users" have to be understood as partitioned between instances, rather than existing across multiple services? I have no idea how to read that statement other than "they did not understand the question".
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from aphyr@woof.group
=> View neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).