@samir honestly, I find it useful just because I think it makes test failures more understandable if the person checking them doesn't know the test suite inside out. You can do a lot with good naming practices, but if you want someone to understand why it's a big deal (or not) if test x is failing, gherkin language is great. But I'm a dedicated test engineer so I'm def biased.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from kate@federatedfandom.net
=> View samir@functional.computer profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).