@noamross
On the one hand, looks like a great paper.
On the other hand, eight of the authors work for the CDC. How on earth did this get published with a copyright statement saying that the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health owns the copyright, and a permissions link implying that Sage gets to adjudicate requests to reuse it? If this is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the US gov't as part of that peron's official duties, it should be in the public domain.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from kdnyhan@social.esmarconf.org
=> View noamross@ecoevo.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).