@ck @april @jomo but that's the funny thing, all this vetocracy means that they are going to hire someone who is vaguely ok for all ten interviewers, over someone who gets nine out of ten very excited but one out of ten unhappy (because queer or neurospicy or not a man or not into cryptoshit or something else).
So they end up hiring a very mediocre techbro identical to the ones they already have, who can somewhat write code but not more than that, passing over highly qualified candidates (because a highly qualified candidate who is a cishet man is not going to apply for a startup where they only pay regular average salary anyway).
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from IngaLovinde@embracing.space
=> View ck@chaos.social profile | View april@macaw.social profile | View jomo@mstdn.io profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).