Toot

Written by astroPug on 2025-01-13 at 06:36

@wendypalmer

Agreed 100%. And I can’t help it, I have to delve into this BS a bit more:

Zuck is being nonsensical.

I read an excerpt from that Rogan podcast. When Zuck threw out those words, he purposely chose vague and not really defined terms. I bet if we asked around what “masculine energy” or “feminine energy” is supposed to be, we’d find that a whole lot of people associate a bunch of different things for each term.

So he was crafty. He knows a certain right-leaning crowd will read masculine energy as things they associate with it, and he nudges them a bit by mentioning he does BJJ in that same paragraph.

But he doesn’t want non-maga to be mad (too late, we are, lol) so he mentioned his daughters, and how he wants the workplace to be inviting for women, etc.

Either way, his entire framing is nonsensical because he assumes that 1. those “energies” are a thing, and that

2. he knows what they are

3. that he can “measure” them and

4. that it is possible to have to much of one of them to achieve some nebulous goal that I must assume is somehow tied to success (but I don’t know, and he doesn’t say).

All I can say is that Donald sure makes the tech ceos dance for their supper.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from astroPug@hachyderm.io

Mentions

=> View wendypalmer@mastodon.au profile

Tags