@wnd yes, I should have been more precise in use of language. I was specifically referring to the generation of unreliable filler content through the regurgitation of hastily hoarded input without consideration to nuance.
The use of scientific approaches to definable problems with measurable outputs can indeed have legitimate use, but the misappropriation of the term AI to mean generated content has poisoned the well
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from mgleadow@mastodon.green
=> View wnd@fosstodon.org profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).