@mafe @xtaldave: Or you're doing something rather new with not yet much to cite. The paper seems to cite some 30 proper references, just the last dozen or so seems to have been added due to reviewers say there are not enough references. Using such a metric to review a paper is just bullshit.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from xtaran@chaos.social
=> View mafe@layer8.space profile | View xtaldave@xtaldave.net profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).