Ancestors

Written by Dave nλ=2dsinθ on 2024-11-11 at 09:48

Absolute shots fired.

From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319924043957

[#]Science #Academia #PeerReview #Research

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xtaldave@xtaldave.net

Written by Axel ⌨🐧🐪🚴😷 | R.I.P Natenom on 2024-11-11 at 09:59

@xtaldave: WTF? How deep has academia sunken that this was necessary?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xtaran@chaos.social

Written by Dave nλ=2dsinθ on 2024-11-11 at 10:36

@xtaran personally, I would have pushed back to the handling editor and told them these citations weren't going to happen, but this is a fun riposte which (a) probably makes it clear who the reviewers are and (b) hopefully encourages them never to pull this shit again.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xtaldave@xtaldave.net

Written by mafe en españa on 2024-11-11 at 11:17

@xtaldave @xtaran If you have nothing to cite maybe your "work" is just bs and not worth going public.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mafe@layer8.space

Toot

Written by Axel ⌨🐧🐪🚴😷 | R.I.P Natenom on 2024-11-11 at 11:28

@mafe @xtaldave: Or you're doing something rather new with not yet much to cite. The paper seems to cite some 30 proper references, just the last dozen or so seems to have been added due to reviewers say there are not enough references. Using such a metric to review a paper is just bullshit.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xtaran@chaos.social

Descendants