Toot

Written by mj on 2024-11-04 at 11:49

@chicob

It sounds like the incentives were not aimed (correctly) at resilience, that is, probably just a word salad meant to give that impression.

However, I also don't think we are at a point in civilization where tweaking a few laws here & there is going to be effective. We need a much more transformative paradigm shift across the board.

I'm not saying we shouldn't try, but that as a complex adaptive system, those small changes are lost against a host of counteracting forces.

For example, we need changes 'upstream' from corporations, not downstream, where they have already basically won. Limits are not that complicated; minimum wages need a complementary maximum income. A license to monopolize in order to bootstrap a new industry for social good needs a termination date (as all corps once had) as well as limits to 'scope' (a simple example of 1 corp not being able to own another corp).

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from MalthusJohn@c.im

Mentions

=> View chicob@mstdn.social profile

Tags

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/toot/113424529059073148
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
1820.866402 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
0.364129 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).