It perplexes me that companies spend time and money creating desktop email clients π€
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anakin78z@mograph.social
@anakin78z it perplexes me that they donβt! π
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mauro@mograph.social
@mauro @anakin78z I've used "Postbox" on Mac (a commercial fork of Thunderbird) because it integrated with the MacOS address book and it allowed me to click dates in plain text to open the calendar. Both of which Thunderbird doesn't do. Postbox was a one-time purchase for a couple of dollars. I can understand that this is not a sustainable business model.
Recently they were bought up by another commercial e-mail company, so now I've moved to Thunderbird despite the lack of OS integration π
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from compfu@mograph.social
@anakin78z You mean because there's Thunderbird already?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from compfu@mograph.social
@compfu no, browser based clients just seem superior in every way.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anakin78z@mograph.social This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini