I’d like to send a special “fuck you buddy” to all the boomers that told me “oh you’ll get more conservative as you get older, once you get some money”
I don’t know what world those people live in, but every day since probably 1989 everything I have seen in the world has only convinced me more and more that capitalism is a disease that is destroying lives and the planet.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cobweb@corteximplant.com
@cobweb I second this.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from BustaMarx@corteximplant.com
@cobweb they don't realize they're saying "money made me an asshole and I can't fathom others behaving differently than me"
or maybe they were always an asshole and have money now idunno. either way not the flex they think
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RadicalEdward@hackers.town
@RadicalEdward @cobweb there's something to be said for caring a lot more about security and tradition when you have kids and a mortgage vs when you're young and can get away with crazy stuff with no consequences, but yeah it doesn't need to make you cold hearted and selfish. Scarcity mindset
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wilbr@glitch.social
@wilbr @RadicalEdward @cobweb in 2025, if you have kids, you should be a radical fighting for them to have a livable future.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from szakib@freeradical.zone
@szakib @RadicalEdward @cobweb for sure, the conservative version of that is "making them nepo baby landlords / slavers" so I agree and the left/right divide is hugely about what people think that means. Humans are really bad at accurately assessing future risk, so if you rank an abstract climate change lower than a tangible "owns a lot of land" your politics is gonna swing hugely.
Hopefully we can have an abundance mindset even in terms of scarcity and danger, but that's hard!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wilbr@glitch.social
@wilbr @szakib @RadicalEdward @cobweb
I've long held what really divides liberals from conservatives is the definition of family. For me 'family' means 'all of us'. For right wing types, family means 'people I can influence'
I was disowned by conservatives because I wouldn't repress my identity and be a good little bootlick. My parents were more concerned with their standing in the church and how it would affect them than their child's wellbeing.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from obscurestar@mastodon.social
@szakib @wilbr @RadicalEdward @cobweb yeah, having kids would’ve made me more radical, especially regarding climate change, but other things as well.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lefthandmonki@mastodon.social
@szakib
As someone without kids, I'm just sitting here waiting for all those folks to give a fuck.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crosswalk@mastodon.world
@wilbr @RadicalEdward @cobweb Not sure what sort of security and tradition the right is offering other than a nostalgic take at Nazi Germany upgraded with more crazy, but OK.
The right's claim to security and tradition (or respect, OMIPU) is on par with its claim to fiscal responsibility, freedom, free-market capitalism, morality, and family values.
Why do people still buy any of it? Seriously, you just repeated it...why you still accept that framing when it's so clearly false as all hell?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crazyeddie@mastodon.social
@crazyeddie @RadicalEdward @cobweb I don't ascribe to it, but basically it's a scarcity, fear, rat race, hierarchy mentality vs abundance, love, cooperation, equality mentality. If your experience of the world is that it's cold and harsh and unforgiving and you need to fight and claw to get a scrap (like, say, your parents raised you this way or you suffered trauma) then it'll be real hard to convince you otherwise: it might be true for others but not for you
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wilbr@glitch.social
@crazyeddie @RadicalEdward @cobweb coming from powerful fascists it's a lie of course, a con, I'm just answering one way of how people could believe in it. (Hippie paradises and revolutions can also be cons, but you bet I'm much more primed to want to believe in them! Greedy people will say anything to gain power.)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wilbr@glitch.social
@wilbr @RadicalEdward @cobweb it's not like we're able to afford those things as we age either
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fluffykittycat@furry.engineer
@RadicalEdward @cobweb being invested in a system, any system really, does make people more likely to overlook its deep, abiding, sometimes planet-ending flaws.
That's natural.
But, we don't get that investment anymore. We just let the ultra-rich loot goddamn everything.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ikanreed@mastodon.social
@RadicalEdward @cobweb Another one they liked to do is get us young when we were first hit by taxes on our paychecks. A lot of us didn't know we could file exempt or that we'd get it all back at the end of the year because you don't make enough to pay taxes as a kid pulling chickens. So that shock, "Oh my God, they took all my money!!!" is the perfect time to push that bullshit right wing crap.
I don't suppose that's changed though since I was entering the workforce as GenX for weed money.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crazyeddie@mastodon.social
@RadicalEdward @cobweb they're saying "I was only less conservative before because I had less money and wanted to make the world better for me specifically. Then I got money, so now fuck you I got mine"
Basically, if you give a single shit about other people, looks like having money will not make you conservative!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
@cobweb @msbw I think one reason is most of us didn't, like them, get more money.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@corbden I worked a long time for people who mostly had a whole lot of money. A whole lot of them in the younger gen X and down expressed the same sentiment, and since part of my job entailed supervising that their donations got done, I can at least attest they put some money where their mouths were.
@cobweb @msbw
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@corbden The more I think about this (apparent, from my anecdata) generational disparity, the more I think it's that the gap between haves and have-nots in the Boomer generation was largely set along demographic lines; they could effectively rely on whatever privilege they started with holding out & didn't mingle beyond it. Whereas late X-onward, post-Reagan, it became clear meritocracy was a lie as social groups mixed, & we accepted "minorities" (incl. women) "should" succeed. @cobweb @msbw
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@corbden The promise of socioeconomic mobility in a more equal social milieu didn't pan out, and class did further entrench for that generation onward, as they saw their of-color or female or multiply marginalized peers get flattened, the regressive moves on taxation & social support undercutting the success that built the middle class. A good number of them got mad. And there's a world of difference between millions and billions - plenty of the former are accidents of zip code. @cobweb @msbw
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor We were literally the first post-segregationist, post-civil rights act generation in the US. Every generation after that has been exposed to more diversity. That's why they destroyed the public school system starting in our generation.
@cobweb @msbw
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@corbden THAT THAT THAT. (I'm a middle millennial, though. Talk about a K-shaped trajectory. With the bottom leg sticking wayyyyy out beyond the top one.) @cobweb @msbw
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb boomers really pulled the ladder up behind them.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from msbw@masto.ai
@msbw @cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb I'm reading the post and replies and guessing you're all from the US. Can you please give some insight to a foreigner as to why these political views (& 1st hand experiences on the impact of late stage capitalism), which I've been reading with increasing frequency over what, 10, 15 years? lack a political movement where to converge and consolidate. I mean since both the US electoral system and the Democratic party are obstacles to any change (are they not?)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kikebenlloch@mastodon.social
@kikebenlloch My myopic best shot: yes, and yes; there's no movement to converge because there's an aggressive and multi-pronged effort to divide and conquer, inclusive of quite a lot of direct state action (e.g. COINTELPRO); trillions in ad & media $ reinforcing cultural attachment at every level to a foundational narrative of self-sufficient individualist meritocracy, persistent even among those who disavow it (e.g. see our climate/ covid response or economic populism.)
@msbw @corbden @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@kikebenlloch Among those who have been on the upside of privilege, it is firmly believed that enough privilege will spare them consequences - heretofore it has. They think enough money will let them buy a ticket out of whatever new discomfort or crisis arises. They don't believe they live in the same factual reality, because they live in such a divergent SOCIAL reality. It's affluenza; they think they can reschedule the sea rise or cancel the storms via room service.
@msbw @corbden @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb And this has given me reason to be grateful that I've lost much of my white middle class cishet American Christian privilege over time, prior to now. Because now I feel far more prepared, emotionally at least, for what's to come. And it allows me empathy and willingness to help those with less than me
But god I wish that isn't what it takes.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@corbden Everyone's individual blinders will vary. Part of my post was to point out: people DON'T have to experience it firsthand to care, necessarily. Some do merely witness and make a CHOICE. Knowledge's light varies, but it IS a choice to be eusocial, and also a choice not to: even if the deck seems impossibly stacked against the right decision.
More, different "cards" weigh differently to different people; what is necessary to one is quite disposable to another. @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor @corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb Just last week I realized that the wealthy are the only minority in the world who are the oppressors and not the oppressed - and they're a tiny minority.
Like any privilege, they have to work hard to see outside it. Like any privilege, they have zero motivation to do so unless they have an inherent love of justice.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from callisto@disabled.social
@callisto I suspect it's hardest to see beyond; it exists on a gradient; what "outsiders" they ever meet look "inside" from here.
Also, one can choose to shed that privilege (or the majority of it - they still know people.) But imo, since the system is built to hoover whatever's not nailed down directly upstream to the worst people alive, better it used for public benefit than disavowed. With community guidance on usage. Even a state collection system…
@corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor Your first ℙ lines up with a thought I've been trying to construct: that there IS still a middle class, but it's been sucked so far up into the income scale that nobody really recognizes it. Because they're wealthy by any sensible measure - but not so wealthy as to purchase legislators, Justices or presidents. [cont'd]
@corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from callisto@disabled.social
@cwicseolfor People who have enough that they don't have to worry, financially anyway, about a major blow like a significant health issue, or a disaster short of losing their every material possession. Who are set for child care, housing, healthcare. That's an income in the nbd of $300K per person in the USA, I'd say, which the 9-to-5s justifiably don't consider "middle class." @corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from callisto@disabled.social
@cwicseolfor But that kind of income and wealth are dwarfed by the billionaires', who they rightly consider to be in a completely different economic class. "Wealthy" doesn't make the distinction, and it's an important one. @corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from callisto@disabled.social
@callisto Personally that's where I distinguish "wealthy" from "rich" - though the sticky wicket is that most people can be "wealthy" - resources in excess of need - on a fairly average salary (after all, nothing about earning more causes a human to have greater resource needs than the poorest, and many do live well on just 2-3x the poverty line in the US.) I would posit two things have changed wrt whether a lofty income achieves "middle class": @corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor According to these two charts, the average salary in the USA only covers the bare necessities with zero left over for savings or discretionary spending. And it posits insurance to cover unexpected losses, which we all know is difficult at best.
https://www.usatoday.com/money/blueprint/business/hr-payroll/average-salary-us/
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/16/salary-a-single-person-needs-to-live-comfortably-in-every-state.html @corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from callisto@disabled.social
@callisto Aside from them mixing up "average" and "median," this is where consumer habits in the US have been designed to detach from the cost of goods. Medicine, housing, transport - the most critical, non-negotiable needs of life - are cripplingly expensive here.
But so much else in life is costly as consumed, rather wrt cost. Poor people know that; median income people forget. My next toot addressed it; eg foodbox subscription vs. local grocer prices.
@corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@callisto I live in flyover land. If I do what coworkers do to save time - use grocery delivery services - they pay their local, coastal prices, with local, coastal wages, FAR ABOVE MEDIAN WAGE (but are average US wages.) I otoh would be paying coastal prices for kale with flyover wages.
Yet - these very delivery services have taken off here among my "middle class" community. Ditto streaming, phone bills, all online shopping. That mismatch drowns people.
@corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@callisto First, inequality within the US has taken off like a rocket; the economies of the coasts are incomprehensible from flyover country; as companies nationalize, so too do prices, which means you can have a pretty comparable middle class experience on $60k or $600k of expenditures without even moving between economies, and without apparent "overconsumption." (Imo, it's still overconsumption, but it looks like what the Joneses are doing, from outside!)
@corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@callisto
Second, partly related to #1, a significant health issue CAN blow up even the very fortunate overnight. All it takes is insurance refusing to cover a condition with significant urgent intervention, or refusing to cover ongoing necessary pharmaceutical intervention (which appears to be what led to one Luigi Mangione.) You can't buy reliably "good" insurance anymore.
So even the 9.9% are near as terrorized as the rest of us. Deliberately.
@corbden @kikebenlloch @msbw @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@kikebenlloch I think a lot of it is because the rentier class has been exceptionally skilled at giving the opposition just enough to buy them off. The 13th Amendment's allowance of continued slavery, to start with. The National Labor Relations Act. The Affordable Care Act. The true middle class has dwindled to a privileged few, while the majority of working people don't have the luxury to look beyond their daily grind.
@msbw @cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from callisto@disabled.social
@msbw @cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb That would be funny/correct if all boomers were doing well. In case you didn't know many are not doing any better than anyone else. So probably better to not condemn people as a class.
The OP is talking to "all the boomers that" not all boomers.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from coffeetest@infosec.exchange
@coffeetest The boomers who (were allowed to) cast ballots, then. @msbw @corbden @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@cwicseolfor @coffeetest @msbw @cobweb *allowed to cast ballots and chose not to vote for their and everyone else's best interests.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@msbw @cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb You seem to have been easily fooled into blaming anyone but the political elites . There are plenty of oldies who, despite ridicule, were the thread of sanity which survived through the Reagan/Thatcher era and beyond. But never mind, the generation after yours will have its own easily fooled contingent which will blame your generation for energy and water sucking AI and data centres.
For God’s sake do some of your own thinking.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Jeffrey@tooting.ch
@Jeffrey @msbw @cwicseolfor @cobweb Both are true and ultimately blame rests with those who have the most power to change things and those who have shaped opinion in their service (billionaires, at this stage). But those in the middle of the power structure (including myself) do need to look at our own actions that brought us here. Otherwise we can't change them.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@Jeffrey @msbw @cwicseolfor @cobweb (Witchzilla is one of the most thoughtful people I follow on here.)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@Jeffrey Sometimes, shorthanding a group behaving a certain way addresses those who behaved in that way rather than intending to state that the entire group conformed without exception. Especially with brief character limits.
In my experience so far, gens Z and A have much better relations with millennials, because there's a sense of solidarity. And in part this is because when we talk about gen collectives, we remember the point above, and interpret with charity.
@msbw @corbden @cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cwicseolfor@urbanists.social
@Jeffrey @cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb nuance for thee but not for me, ah well Jeffery, it was nice meeting you
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from msbw@masto.ai
@corbden @cwicseolfor @cobweb @msbw
It cannot be overstated how many people's brains broke when we started integrating schools. A huge amount of the modern conservative movement has a direct line back to that.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jargoggles@kolektiva.social
@corbden @cwicseolfor @cobweb @msbw
You talking about how racist shitstains threw a big screaming tantrum and started working to destroy public education and civil services because they know they're unable to compete on a level playing field?
I'll give that some credit but speaking of credit. Before the entitled boomers, credit really wasn't a thing. They drove up prices and sold their children into debt to keep up with the Jones'.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from obscurestar@mastodon.social
@cwicseolfor @corbden @cobweb @msbw US Boomers had everything handed to them. Women and PoC couldn't get equal jobs/education/loans. Lots of people died in WWII, Europe's economy was in ruin, Asia's economy was closed. They had all the labor rights and education access prior generations struggled to give them and few in prior generations had used credit.
Boomers stole and squandered it all on themselves.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from obscurestar@mastodon.social
@obscurestar @cwicseolfor @cobweb @msbw Remember though that those said women and POC were also boomers. Don't give the whole generation over to those who screwed the other half.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@corbden @obscurestar @cwicseolfor @cobweb notice how now we’re all sidetracked to reassure the “not all boomers” crowd who jumped in here to derail the larger conversation?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from msbw@masto.ai
@msbw @corbden @cwicseolfor @cobweb
Yeah. I mean. I guess I in part understand. I get a little rubbed the wrong way when lumped in with 'white voters' (eg: The idiots who voted for Trump) BUT I don't police it because I understand it's not me that's being talked about and concise wording in limited text is a challenge and sometimes people just need catharsis.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from obscurestar@mastodon.social
@obscurestar @msbw @cwicseolfor @cobweb My main thing (as not a boomer) is making sure we don't blame victims for choices they had zero part in making and in many cases actively fought. But we all know that... right? :)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from corbden@defcon.social
@corbden @cwicseolfor @cobweb @msbw
My mother and aunts were at least partially complicit, making excuses for the men. Also, let's not forget that bulk of the damage the boomers did was not in the 1960s but in the 1980s and 90s. They're a far larger group than Gen X. They have basically controlled all the shit decisions for my entire life.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from obscurestar@mastodon.social
@cobweb Same. When I was twenty I still believed in many of the political opinions my parents have. I was way more conservative than I am now.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from CatoTheYoungest@corteximplant.com
@cobweb I recall my evolution in college, going from center-right through socialism, libertarianism, anarchism, a kind of cybernetics, etc. Exposure to ideas may have made it erratic, but it was at least fermenting.
Then, with my face shoved into the reality of the world, I kept getting more progressive. 30 years later I am even moreso.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from StevenSavage@sfba.social
@StevenSavage @cobweb Same. I was VP of College Republicans, then voted Libertarian in a bunch of elections. When George W Bush gave us the first really good look at unrestrained capitalism on a national scale...I tacked left and never stopped tacking left.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from chrisod@social.lol
@cobweb
A double-fuck-you to all the boomers who told us that, then enacted policies which, amazingly, prevented us from accumulating any money.
Bonus points go to my father, who insisted that he was able to start a comfortable and fiscally-stable life while going to college and working a gas station job, and didn't quite get why that's no longer a viable option for any of us.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from theogrin@chaosfem.tw
@theogrin
I was assigned boomer at birth, catching the last year or so of that demographic. All my conscious existence I thought to myself, “no fucking way are these my people” (or as close to that as my 6-year old brain had the vocabulary for).
Thanks to whoever defined Generation Jones to bring me (and countless others) out of the last half of the boomer demographic.
It would be interesting to know what the ratio of hourly wage (maybe expressed as an annual salary) to tuition, both in your father’s time and today.
As for student loans (okay, you didn’t mention them, this free bonus content, worth what it costs), I recall reading about a boomer going to university in the late 1960s/early 1970s. He had some student loan money left over at the time of graduation.
So he used it to buy an entire car. (I couldn’t make this up). Maybe it was an exceptional case.
@cobweb
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RuthODay@chaosfem.tw This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini