I am so excited about the migration from X that I made a whole YouTube video about what it takes to run a social media company in a responsible way.
Don't worry, I will be back to covering the normal topics and the war in Ukraine next time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8zfgIgZ4c0
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anderspuck@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck
My problem IS #SpaceKaren 😆
Otherwise I agree with everything you said in this video.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DeeGLloyd@mastodon.world
@DeeGLloyd Hehe, yeah, I don't like him either. But there are many CEOs that I don’t particularly like, and I still use their products.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anderspuck@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck Looks like you miss the point - Musk used Xitter for exactly what he's achieved - shadow leadership of the USA. And I can't get excited about people leaving only now, though for their own personal dignity it's better late than never.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from davidpnice@mastodon.online
@davidpnice It would have been better sooner, but still I think it’s good if he loses his platform.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anderspuck@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck But now you've got the advertisers crawling back. Good to know which ones to boycott.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from davidpnice@mastodon.online
@davidpnice @anderspuck exactly. Twitter served his purpose.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elCelio@mastodon.uno
@anderspuck Great video, thank you!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from krst@mastodon.social
@anderspuck Yes, but Bluesky is rather concerning, what with its ties to crypto and indirectly Russia as well (as @davetroy has noted).
https://toad.social/@davetroy/113493454665487197
https://toad.social/@davetroy/113476788536250587
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from stromfeldt@mastodon.xyz
@anderspuck I know you use Ghost, but I'm not sure if you're aware that the Ghost team is currently in the process of integrating the platform with ActivityPub (& effectively Mastodon). It'd surely be nice if open source & decentralised Mastodon could catch on a bit more.
The info page describing Ghost's upcoming integration is no longer live, but here's an archive of the page if you've never seen it:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240510213133/https://activitypub.ghost.org/
And blog/updates on their ongoing work here:
https://activitypub.ghost.org
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from stromfeldt@mastodon.xyz
@stromfeldt I have seen it. It will be interesting to see what they come up with. I probably won’t be using it before it is out of beta, but I like the idea.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anderspuck@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck Yeah, probably a good idea to wait. I likely won't be using it either way, as I had somebody create a script to connect Ghost (and its membership system) to the open source forum software Discourse. The next thing to be built is an aggregating system, which will aggregate several Ghost-using blogs/newsletters, which will then all share the one Discourse instance for commenting. "Own your software ecosystem" kinda thing.
If you're curious:
https://github.com/vikaspotluri123/discourse-on-ghost
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from stromfeldt@mastodon.xyz
@anderspuck
Platforms are only as responsible actors as their leadership - and I say this having spent a decade in the leadership of one (which scored high on moderation, but not on APIs). Can't truly evaluate Twitter without Dorsey, X without Musk, or Threads without Zuckerberg and Mosseri.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from osma@mas.to
That's where federation comes into play. A federated platform has multiple leadership and policies. It might be harder to assess, but it also will be more resilient to bias creep (as well as to long term threats).
@anderspuck
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from osma@mas.to
That's the attribute I am watching wrt Bluesky. It is decentralized, you can run your own PDS, it does have open APIs, it does have 3rd party clients. It even has the capability of multiple moderation policies (3rd party labeling services). It still does not have relays and discovery independent of Bluesky Inc, so they have that master control. But the path has been toward becoming not only decentralized but in fact federated, over time.
@anderspuck
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from osma@mas.to
@anderspuck than you for taking the effort proposing some meaningful parameters for discussion.
I am courious whether you will do a similar analyses on Meta platforms. I am also courious about your perspective on shadow ban of certain views (as happened during corona ob twitter) this seems to be important for social media especually in times of crisis - personally lost confidence in “Old” twitter at that point.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jonasrygaard@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck But I'll never leave mastodon as it is right now, it's so much better than everyone else
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kimwulff@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck apropos bots, har du så set den konto her? https://romeosquared.eu/author/anders-puck-nielsen/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jakobmhc@mastodon.social
@anderspuck Before the APIs were closed off for research they were closed off as open source APIs which allowed third party access for alternative platforms to display tweets. For me this walled garden was a precursor to what is currently happening. The worsening of social media is moving people to Whatsapp or Discord groups where moderation is done with smaller social circles and group norms like early forums. I don't take it as a given that Bluesky etc will take over like Twitter before it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tadcan@tabletop.vip
@tadcan No, it's not a given. There are different use cases and some people want conversations in smaller groups. Others want to use it as a microblog for a public audience.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anderspuck@krigskunst.social
@anderspuck For a brief period with FB's rise and the cost associated with sending texts on Dumb phones meant people were generally restricted to the walled garden or public sphere with some accommodation with groups or G+ circles. The Open Source world feared market capture. What interests me is the ratios of people who engage with micro-blogging versus closed groups and how will researchers account for communication that stays behind encryption. Is there a maximum ratio of one to the other?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tadcan@tabletop.vip This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini