@drewdevault wrote a blog that rust developers should give up on rust-in-linux https://drewdevault.com/2024/08/30/2024-08-30-Rust-in-Linux-revisited.html he got negative reactions, that target him personally, which he posted here: https://hachyderm.io/@drewdevault@fosstodon.org/113055940248374740
But a paternalistic blog post is never friendly. He wrote a straight forward "fork off". So he should not be surprised that people disregard his opinion and his way of expressing opinions. Sure one could express disagreement more.
[#]rustlang #rustinlinux
1/2
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crop@hachyderm.io
A reaction that repeats the tone of the initial fork-off-blog-post that suggest "C developers should fork a C only Linux" will not happen, because of the power imbalance between the two groups.
I am wondering what a appropriate, but resolute, reaction to such an "friendly", but paternalistic, writing is.
2/2
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crop@hachyderm.io
~~maybe i should have used condescending and not paternalistic in the previous toots.~~ now i think paternalistic is right, but I am still not sure.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crop@hachyderm.io
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).