at the same time if you want to know where the labor theory of value originates it's important context i guess. i just don't like the way adam smith writes at all, it lacks any semblance of rigor and i guess that populism is what made this book so influential. he spends ages talking about the history of things with very little citation or any purpose, most chapters could end up distilled to half their length, whatever
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from tulips@shrike.club
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).