@deevybee That is hilarious on many aspects (including when they call Nature Communications a "top journal"). But obviously really frustrating and silly on others. Surely the authors must have been able to appeal (if they still wanted to publish there after this blunder)?
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from elduvelle@neuromatch.social
=> View deevybee@mastodon.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).