"loops is violating it's own license"
the license doesn't apply to the licensor if they're the sole copyright owner
currently the only commits are authored by dansup so he can do whatever the fuck he wants because he owns the code
many people hate AGPL because often what happens is that companies use it, make any contributors sign a CLA granting the company copyright ownership, and so the company can relicense the software or do whatever the fuck they want but everyone else is bound by AGPL
loops doesn't seem to have a CLA as of yet at least
AGPL is only cool if your copyright ownership is distributed between a fuck ton of contributors so everyone is bound by it and noone gets special treatment
obligatory IANAL and this is not legal advice
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from lunareclipse@snug.moe
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).