Here's another twist to the UK Online Safety Act that's just occurred to me. As a site operator, I am obliged to have a procedure for users to report illegal content and to take that content down if it really is illegal. But who makes that judgement? It's easy to imagine unclear cases. E.g. a discussion thread on Assisted Dying could be viewed by many people as legitimate discussion but a zealot might report it as "encouraging or assisting suicide" which is illegal. 1/2
[#]osa #OnlineSafetyAct
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from CGM@mastodon.scot
=> View OnlineSafetyAct tag | View osa tag This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini