@hakamadare None taken!
And yes I TOTALLY agree.
I think there's a lot of that, and I also think that many people who work in our field, whether they'd admit it or not, have a tendency to choose a suite of tools and worship them as the Holy of Holies, not to be supplanted, replaced or augmented by any other.
(And if that sounds far fetched to you, tell me you DON'T know a sizable group of people who still use Vim, code in nothing but C and consider UNIX to be the second coming and the ultimate evolution of technology for all time :)
I pride myself on being a pragmatist. I make a point of trying out new tools, and ESPECIALLY whole new types/categories of tools as they become available.
I purposefully don't TRUST llms and am very careful to constrain the ways in which I use them to areas where I am 1000% sure I can fully understand what they produce, or at least the results that their output produces, but I do find them useful and convenient. There's nothing magical about them. They're just a way to save time and effort in areas where it makes sense.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from feoh@oldbytes.space
=> View hakamadare@wrong.tools profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).