Wait, so if for..in
is the “consume” part of the iteration effect, I think break
maps to a logical return, and continue
maps to the next iteration.
I’ve seen people talk about “break with value” before - e.g. the loop exiting with a value. But I don’t think I’ve seen people talk about “continue with value before”.
The latter seems like it would rather neatly map to coroutines, wouldn’t it? E.g. continue 12u32;
to resume the coroutine with a u32 could work?
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from yosh@toot.yosh.is
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).