I hate it when I see something that claims to make a point about something like ADHD, mental health, or a 'human' aspect of science - but it's actually meaningless from a scientific standpoint. It's riddled with confounds, leading questions, false equivalence, and any other number of issues. I don't want to call it out, because I don't want people to misunderstand my feelings about the message it's trying to send, but at the same time I hate letting sloppy researchers get away with it.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from LewisWorkshop@mastodon.online
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).