"Paleo Diet Debunked: Ancient Humans Ate Plants, Study Shows"
I think I'm old enough, and was reading things enough, to know how this whole thing evolved. The original "Paleo" stuff was based on archaeological evidence, was moderate in claims, and was not at all the bro-science "Paleo" that came later. That was taken to extremes and to absurdity.
Now that the bro version is done(?), can we return to the scientific version, or will it be off limits?
I fear the answer.
https://www.sciencealert.com/paleo-diet-debunked-ancient-humans-ate-plants-study-shows
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from John@socks.masto.host
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).