@glitzersachen @uint8_t Sure, but who get's how much might be easier to decide. Not that powers wouldn't want more powers in any case.
How we decide what is a fair share and how do we agree what is important will likely always be a point of contention.
But maybe we could agree on simpler questions if there are more objective measures. Like basic needs will be served first before everything else.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from neuron@chaos.social
=> View glitzersachen@hachyderm.io profile | View uint8_t@chaos.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).