Continuing on to read the New Yorker article about the plagiarism case (sleep, what’s sleep?), it’s striking that 10-15 years ago, the plaintiff was receiving rejections along the lines of the work not being novel enough (vs the point in the first essay about the sameness of trend-chasing slop)
“I thought the writing, the storytelling, in this manuscript was simply wonderful,” one e-mail read, but “we are . . . looking for things that fall into a newer territory.” Another editor wrote,“While the writing is really great and Anna was a very likable heroine, I worry that there are not enough new and different elements to the story here that would set it apart from the rest of the novels in the competitive paranormal/romance/YA market.”
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from wendypalmer@mastodon.au
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).