@YKantRachelRead @roadblock161_ Are you really comparing me asking them to put CW on lewd posts so that people can choose if they want to see them to wanting to ban kink from pride?
I'm far from Christian, I'm pro-kink at pride, your response makes absolutely no sense. Putting a CW on a post does not make it disappear, it's not censoring, it's giving people the ability to choose if they want to see lewd posts or not. Kink at pride is precisely entirely about consent. Which is not the case with kitsunes.gay, they're violating everyone's consent.
I can block and move on, but the problem will remain on fedi, which is why I'm bringing it up. Any other instance would have been mass defederated by now and the meta caused by it would be so big that they would eventually shut down, but for some reason they can do whatever they want and nothing happens to them. I don't want them gone, spaces where queer people can be lewd are extremely important, but other people's consent is also important. What I want is for them to either enforce content warnings or switch to allowlist federation.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from mochi@antabaka.me
=> View YKantRachelRead@treehouse.systems profile | View roadblock161_@ni.hil.ist profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).