Toot

Written by mochi 🌸 on 2025-01-12 at 18:43

@roadblock161_

  1. It's not the posts that bother me, it's the lack of CW, and it doesn't bother just me, it bothers multiple people who have asked them to enforce CWs before and they consistently keep finding excuses to not do it. They're violating consent because they're not giving the ability for people to choose to read the posts

  1. It's not just her, it's the whole instance, but she's a moderator and is dating the admin

  1. It is not on me or on the people having to deal with this to fix the problem for them, it should be them having the decency to either CW their stuff or switch to allowlist federation instead of full federation

  1. It's hypocritical of her to claim to care so much about child safety and then be trampling all over minors' (and adults') consent by making it possible for them to accidentally run into these un-CW'ed lewd posts

  1. It's hypocritical of her to accuse someone of making a "lewd" joke (a milk carton with someone's face on it, which is only lewd if you make it lewd) because minors can see it and then be posting all of these lewd and frankly disgusting posts that both minors and adults have to deal with

In conclusion, it can be summarized to a single sentence: consent is opt-in, not opt-out. If someone sends me an unsolicited nude, I'm not the one at fault, it's the person who sent it. Same logic applies to this. kitsunes.gay is violating everyone's consent.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from mochi@antabaka.me

Mentions

=> View roadblock161_@ni.hil.ist profile

Tags

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/toot/113816856132951566
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
224.787405 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
0.417805 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).