@saxnot That's certainly one way to do part of the check.
Things get complicated when you consider that any of the clients submitting their media for local cache might be lying; and when the upstream changes the contents available from the URI.
If upstream only published content using a content hash as an identifier ... that would be interesting.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from yojimbo@hackers.town
=> View saxnot@chaos.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).