I can’t help but feel that the punishment is overly harsh. Yes he absolutely shouldn’t have done it. But they haven’t said that it actually caused any harm, and he was doing it in good faith (although, again shouldn’t have). They also admit that his financial situation could justify a reduced penalty, so it feels ridiculous that they don’t reduce the penalty to something he can actually afford.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net
=> View BenDoubleU@lemmy.radio profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).