well, yes. But also this is an extremely difficult to price product. 200$/m is already insane, but now you’re suggesting they should’ve gone even more aggressive. It could turn out almost nobody would use it. An optimal price here is a tricky guess.
Although they probably should’ve sold a “limited subscription”. That does give you max break-even amount of queries per month, or 2x of that, but not 100x, or unlimited. Otherwise exactly what happened can happen.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
=> View MNByChoice@midwest.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).