Yeah, the tweet clearly says that the subscribers they have are using it more than they expected, which is costing them more than $200 per month per subscriber just to run it.
I could see an argument for an economy of scales kind of situation where adding more users would offset the cost per user, but it seems like here that would just increase their overhead, making the problem worse.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
=> View sc_griffith@awful.systems profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).