@mike Why so annoyed? It's just one way of representing the various so-called "black" types of open access. Other representations are possible.
I don't know why she put it that way, but I doubt she wanted to have poles or opposites that exclude each other. For me it's more important to see the elements as a whole and the connections between them.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from georgfischer@openbiblio.social
=> View mike@sauropods.win profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).