@ekuber
@carbsrule_en
Builders do support the incremental use case where different parts of the code do building, and cloning a builder to form a template, and such.
Maybe I haven't done enough reading but I don't think default field values can replace all builder use cases, right?
Not that they have to. I'm intrigued by the possibilities of default field values, so thinking it through.This looks like a better way to support the default parameter use case for instance.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from faassen@fosstodon.org
=> View ekuber@hachyderm.io profile | View carbsrule_en@polyglot.city profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).