@amici @susankayequinn
Hmm. Thanks for catching that.
I'm of two minds. On one hand, using these tools for increasing accessibility of art is usually one of the applications I'm most likely to see as a net positive, but knowing that they previously employed human narrators is pretty much textbook automation-driven job loss for folks in creative fields.
I'd have to really know who reaps the savings to know how I feel about this. Is the Grist investor owned? If someone could show that this savings allowed them to publish more fiction or journalism, I'd be understanding. But if it's a profitable enterprise and this is just to improve margins, that's pretty gross.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from FullyAutomatedRPG@mstdn.games
=> View amici@fribygda.no profile | View susankayequinn@wandering.shop profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).