fwiw the post this is replying to originally didn’t have the phrase “instead of very obviously reacting to the headline,” I edited that in later. without the edit I think it does come across like I thought zweibel was contradicting some specific point in the article. not true, they didn’t address the article at all
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from sc_griffith@awful.systems
=> View CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).