@mbpaz
OK, re-reading what you object to is that one should point the particular paper that "should" be cited.
There I can agree, although there'as a whole range on reviewer / author / editor behaviours and unspoken rules.
I think it's often helpful that the reviewer cites precisely some papers to point to them. Whether this sounds more or less as a request/order to cite them is the question, and the usually very superficial way the rev/author/editor discussions don't help.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from jocelyn_etienne@scicomm.xyz
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).