@mbpaz
But maybe you are more acquainted to formal sciences (maths, logics, computing) than natural sciences ? Then I guess the issue can be different, since you are entitled to build your own work from your chosen premises, as long as this is clear.
But even then: what if you re-create, say, Euclidean geometry but don't cite Euclid? Isn't that a problem? Or you have reviewed Euclid's work previously and only cite your own review from now on?
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from jocelyn_etienne@scicomm.xyz
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).