They’re trying to argue legal technicalities because acknowledging that they’re trying to reduce compatibility with servers like vaultwarden would be bad PR.
Per their new license, anyone that uses their SDK to build a client cannot say, “this is for Bitwarden and compatible servers like vaultwarden”. They cannot support those other servers, per their license. Anyone that gets suckered into using their SDK now becomes a force against alternative implementations.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
=> View someguy3@lemmy.world profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).