Not the whole code but only the part that triggers those flags. Not everyone is versed in C to “verify the code” himself…
You don’t say. And the developer pointing to some piece of code and telling those people who cannot understand it themselves that it’s not malicious achieves anything?
If it’s a false positive there isn’t even anything to show in the first place. Nobody but the antivirus vendors know for sure why something triggers a false positive.
That’s a stupid take, It’s like saying to a toddler to change his diapers on his own when it’s dirty.
It’s like a toddler telling you you’re changing their diapers wrong and expecting you to explain to them what you did wrong even though you did everything correctly and the toddler doesn’t know anything about changing diapers in the first place.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from lol@discuss.tchncs.de
=> View N0x0n@lemmy.ml profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).