The way I understand it is that they can relicense it and then publish it if they want, but the GPL would still fully apply to the previous versions.
The first question you cited seems to refer to any different organisation/individual making changes to the source code. And the second seems to refer to revoking the GPL for an already released version, which they would of course not be allowed to do.
This would make sense as ownership of the copyright would supersede a license.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from AwakenedAce@lemmy.blahaj.zone
=> View EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).