Toot

Written by π•½π–šπ–†π–Žπ–‰π–π–—π–Žπ–Œπ– on 2024-09-12 at 23:12

A studio should be able to afford a good LTO tape drive for at least one backup copy; LTO tapes last over 30 years and suffer less from random bitrot than spinning disks. Just pay someone to spend a month duplicating the entire archive every couple of decades. And every decade you can also consolidate a bunch of tapes since the capacity has kept increasing; 18TB tapes are now available: $/MB it’s always far cheaper to use tape.

They could have done that with the drives, but today you’d have to go find an ATA IDE or old SCSI card (of you’re lucky) that’ll work on a modern motherboard.

But I’d guess their problem is more not having a process for maintaining the archives than the technology. Duplicating and consolidating hard drives once a year would have been relatively cheap, and as long as they verified checksums and kept duplicates, HDs would have been fine too.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from sxan@midwest.social

Mentions

=> View deegeese@sopuli.xyz profile

Tags

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/toot/113127112050627328
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
220.860004 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
0.442922 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).