@azonenberg @electronic_eel @gsuberland hm I’ll have to dig into the spec, but does it actually need to be synchronised? I mean, you could just spray and pray, and let TCP deal with any out of order frames. The only reason LACP does N-way hashing to send a single flow down a single link is to avoid out of order frames. You can do channel-bonding without LACP - Cisco calls it EtherChannel, and it’s what you get when you set “mode on” on a channel-group instead of “mode active” or “mode passive” which starts LACP.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread | More toots from jpm@aus.social
=> View azonenberg@ioc.exchange profile | View electronic_eel@treehouse.systems profile | View gsuberland@chaos.social profile
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).