Ancestors

Toot

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 17:02

I understand why they're doing this but if I was okay with Google being able to lock me out of my password manager then I would simply be using Google's password manager already

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Descendants

Written by Walker on 2025-02-04 at 17:05

@mcc but what if I need that password in bitwarden to access my email? Hmmm....

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Walker@infosec.exchange

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 17:06

@Walker Right? It's just :|

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Kaito on 2025-02-04 at 19:29

@Walker @mcc just use keepassxc to save your email password

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kaito02@mastodon.social

Written by Walker on 2025-02-04 at 19:41

@kaito02 @mcc this could turn into a nesting doll worth of password managers.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Walker@infosec.exchange

Written by John Francis on 2025-02-04 at 17:05

@mcc I don't use a gmail domain email for Bitwarden. So I can host that email address elsewhere, at some point...sure is inconvenient and difficult to migrate away from all that Google & Android stuff tho...

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from johnefrancis@cosocial.ca

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 17:07

@johnefrancis Something has to be at the root. If I self host a domain I have to worry what happens if that domain stops working and I need to use email 2FA to fix the domain.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by John Francis on 2025-02-04 at 17:13

@mcc I want 3-4 hardware keys as the roots. Keep one out for regular use, the rest distributed in safes. If I lose the safe combination, I can pay a locksmith to open it. I can put a hardware key in a safety deposit box.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from johnefrancis@cosocial.ca

Written by John Francis on 2025-02-04 at 17:09

@mcc also...I have a hardware key. BW has never been super good about letting me put the hardware key as the highest priority auth method and demoting everything else to recovery (or oblivion)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from johnefrancis@cosocial.ca

Written by Dragon-sided D on 2025-02-04 at 17:08

@mcc

https://bitwarden.com/help/self-host-an-organization/

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dragonsidedd@sciencemastodon.com

Written by Henri on 2025-02-04 at 17:11

@mcc New fear unlocked.

Gotta start making backups of my passwords now, I guess.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from slyecho@mdon.ee

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 17:12

@slyecho I haven't looked into what the emergency options are

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Henri on 2025-02-04 at 17:14

@mcc Export .json, .csv, .json (encrypted)

But how to automate it...

Gotta hope that when I need my email password now on a new device that I also have a device handy where I logged in before.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from slyecho@mdon.ee

Written by Dan Hugo on 2025-02-04 at 20:16

@slyecho @mcc

https://bitwarden.com/help/cli/

bw login, export…

I use this now and then, similar to pass, which I use often.

I too am dismayed that additional “features” get added with a little “Surprise!” element to them 🫤

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from danhugo@fosstodon.org

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 20:24

@danhugo @slyecho They are at least giving ample advance warning on this one

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Dan Hugo on 2025-02-04 at 20:29

@mcc @slyecho

Another blinking light to pay attention to…

I recently switched devices and encountered this, and I was just mentioning the encrypted credentials problem for backups when your credentials are encrypted in the backup so decrypting or accessing the backup…

As long as it keeps my SSN safe from hackers ;-)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from danhugo@fosstodon.org

Written by Dan Hugo on 2025-02-05 at 20:52

@mcc @slyecho

Received email notification this morning from Bitwarden regarding new login procedure.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from danhugo@fosstodon.org

Written by Gordon Little on 2025-02-04 at 17:16

@mcc I did see this:

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gord@peoplemaking.games

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 17:24

@gord Thank you.

The problem is some form of 2FA does seem like a good idea. I wonder if there's a way to get some of the benefits without adding hard gmail failure points.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 17:26

@gord I am considering suggesting as a third option offering a "reverse 2FA" option:

This could help with catastrophe scenarios while creating only limited risk of a Problem

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Thibug on 2025-02-04 at 17:58

@mcc @gord isn't it how the emergency access work for BW? When I set it up I'm pretty sure it was how it was setup, maybe minus the approve part before the end of the delay.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Thibug@mastodon.social

Written by Gordon Little on 2025-02-04 at 18:14

@mcc That is a good idea.

Now that said, is there a reason you don't want to do regular 2FA through an authenticator app? That seems like a secure enough option. Print off the backup codes and keep them safe in case you lost your device.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gord@peoplemaking.games

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 18:45

@gord Bitwarden is my authenticator app

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Gordon Little on 2025-02-04 at 18:51

@mcc Bitwarden Password Manager can be hooked up to Bitwarden Authenticator to do 2FA, in which case they do not do the email authentication part (if I'm reading all this correctly). The email part is only if you use the password manager without 2FA.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gord@peoplemaking.games

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 18:52

@gord okay so i guess then the idea is i never get locked out as long as i still have one remaining device running bitwarden?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Gordon Little on 2025-02-04 at 18:57

@mcc When you hook the authenticator app up, you get a bunch of backup codes, you print those off and save them somewhere very safe. Those are your safety net. With those you can lose all your devices and still be OK.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gord@peoplemaking.games

Written by D2 on 2025-02-05 at 00:42

@mcc @gord I am concerned about a scenario: email doesn’t get a reply because I don’t notice it. Vacation, or just a ludicrous amt of spam in my inbox.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cascheranno@hachyderm.io

Written by mcc on 2025-02-05 at 00:54

@cascheranno @gord i am describing a hypothetical opt-in feature. one can set an email client to highlight certain things so they are not missed

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Man aging with style on 2025-02-04 at 17:23

@mcc

Can't you use a physical token, like, say, a Yubikey instead? That'd be much more secure than a flippin' email.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from praxiscode@mastodon.online

Written by Leo Ré Jorge on 2025-02-04 at 17:24

@mcc I got this and had the same reaction... Wondering what is the 2 step login alternative they offer there... But it's definitely a weird loop to be in if your email password is in bitwarden in the first place

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from LeoRJorge@mastodon.social

Written by jcoglan on 2025-02-04 at 17:54

@mcc I feel very strongly that a credential manager, or really any sort of secure secret store, should not have a dependency on a third party, never mind a completely open-ended third party category like "any user's email provider"

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jcoglan@mastodon.social

Written by jcoglan on 2025-02-04 at 17:55

@mcc to be more specific, a dependency the user did not actively opt into, by e.g. saying "I would like you to store my data in "

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jcoglan@mastodon.social

Written by jcoglan on 2025-02-04 at 17:56

@mcc the whole point of the cryptography in these systems is that the mechanism for verifying the identity of the person trying to unlock the store is baked into the store itself

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jcoglan@mastodon.social

Written by Alison on 2025-02-04 at 18:06

@mcc my bitwarden points to proton. Seems fine to nee?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cosmic_spinnerette@mastodon.social

Written by Leif on 2025-02-04 at 18:23

@mcc this only happens if you dont already have 2FA enabled. Just enable a TOTP Authenticator on your account and this behavior goes away. Should be the default anyway.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jantzen@mas.to

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 18:48

@jantzen ? but isn't bitwarden my TOTP authenticator?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 18:50

@jantzen Is your suggestion that I set up Bitwarden to only let me log in on a new device if I TOTP authenticate on a second, existing Bitwarden device?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Jackie Officecouch on 2025-02-04 at 18:56

@mcc @jantzen in principle, I think you’re supposed to have a separate password manager and TOTP authenticator, since otherwise you’re reducing your two factors to one. I don’t really know how much that matters, or what considerations your threat model makes about a breach of your password manager

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shadowfacts@social.shadowfacts.net

Written by mcc on 2025-02-04 at 18:57

@shadowfacts @jantzen is it actually true that two programs on my phone is more secure than one program on my phone?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Written by Jackie Officecouch on 2025-02-04 at 18:59

@mcc @jantzen it would shift the single point of failure to your device, away from a cloud-synced thing. how exactly that affects one’s threat model, ¯(ツ)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shadowfacts@social.shadowfacts.net

Written by Emile Snyder on 2025-02-05 at 15:34

@mcc @shadowfacts @jantzen well, in the scenario under discussion (logging in to bitwarden on a new device) isn't their concern that it's currently 0 programs on my phone? All that's needed is my master password.

As I read their announcement, if one has some non-email 2FA set up already, then the new email based 2FA is not required, right?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from esnyder@mastodon.social

Written by DJ Sundog from the new toot-lab on 2025-02-04 at 18:25

@mcc as much as I love my bitwarden I love even more that I bit the bullet and set it up to self-host so they can’t throw curveballs at me. we shouldn’t have to work so hard to stay in the “you can have a nice thing” zone really.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from djsundog@fedi.reclaim.technology

Written by D2 on 2025-02-05 at 00:37

@mcc yeah, am a bitwarden paying customer & this’ll be a deal-breaker for me.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cascheranno@hachyderm.io

Written by mcc on 2025-02-05 at 00:39

@cascheranno it can be turned off https://peoplemaking.games/@gord/113946747876533938

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mcc@mastodon.social

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113946692170660804
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
517.170997 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
16.38286 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).