There is some beauty in the fact that my oldest #Python project first
is still in the top 1% of PyPI. The last release was six years ago, I don’t expect another one ever again, and yet its functionality never made it into the standard library due to gatekeeping.
https://clickpy.clickhouse.com/dashboard/first
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hynek@mastodon.social
@hynek What kind of gatekeeping they practice?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from via4@mastodon.social
@via4 There’s this running gag of https://docs.python.org/3/library/itertools.html being mostly great at showing what functions itertools COULD contain. It’s a turf thing and that’s all I’ll say on that topic.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hynek@mastodon.social
@hynek @via4 still salty there's no proper partition
or nth_element
and similar in there 🦧🍋
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from djh@chaos.social
@djh @hynek @via4
As doc says everything could be achieved using those primitives.
So, these two could be implemented using islice
.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lig@fosstodon.org
@lig @hynek @via4 I believe that's where the mindsets differ.
I'd appreciate a high-level and well-built abstraction such as partition
so that I can work on my domain specific problem without first having to worry about the nitty gritty details.
It's batteries included for a reason 🔋✨
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from djh@chaos.social
@djh @lig @hynek I feel conflicted about it, on one hand I like minimalism, and it's easier to just be able to remember everything a lib can do, so you immediately know what is there and what you have to implement/import. On the other hand, it is kind of annoying to copy the same stuff over from project to project, first() being maybe one of the top examples
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from via4@mastodon.social
@via4 @djh @lig there's always a tension which batteries should be included and which not and everybody wants to be minimalistic as long it covers their minimal needs 🤷♂️ I feel like iteration tools that help you write better and more idiomatic code and that are easy to get wrong should be a prime group tho
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hynek@mastodon.social
@hynek @via4 @djh
Well, there are two questions here: what should be included in a library according to its purpose? And what should be included as a battery in a standard library?
Personally, I'd like to see much less in Python's stdlib than there's now. However, regarding iteration tools I'd rather agree that they should be an integral part of a language and they are in several other languages.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lig@fosstodon.org
@hynek they couldn't have resisted if you just called it coalesce() :)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from via4@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini