OpenAI: we are for the humanity, why would you accuse us of stealing?!
Also OpenAI: distillation of our model is a crime against humanity.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bitinn@mastodon.gamedev.place
OpenAI: look, do you think the Chinese could ever catch up with us by fair game? Unlike them, we were the first to steal.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bitinn@mastodon.gamedev.place
OpenAI: if companies can just steal our fruits of labor, who would ever spend billions training foundational models?!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bitinn@mastodon.gamedev.place
OpenAI: even if you donโt agree with our approach to business, could you please think of our hardworking employees who have families to raise?!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bitinn@mastodon.gamedev.place
@bitinn If news publishers accuse OpenAI of theft by showing that prompting ChatGPT with news articles produces exactly match their original articles, and if chatbots trained on OpenAI's data respond with 'I am ChatGPT,โ would this be sufficient evidence in court to prove copyright infringement?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from siuying@mastodon.hk
@bitinn "No, it's just numbers! DeepSeek is just learning from openAI like a human would! If someone studied chatGPT output all their life, they could do it too! Where is the difference?"
Hilarious, I'm here for this.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mmby@mastodon.social
@bitinn
HEY, give that back I stole it fair and square.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tacitus@mastodon.gamedev.place This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini