when editors screw up: an unhappy tale about Nature Communications
https://goodscience.substack.com/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from deevybee@mastodon.social
@deevybee That is hilarious on many aspects (including when they call Nature Communications a "top journal"). But obviously really frustrating and silly on others. Surely the authors must have been able to appeal (if they still wanted to publish there after this blunder)?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elduvelle@neuromatch.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini