Ancestors

Toot

Written by brentpatterson on 2025-01-20 at 02:17

After considerable research and experience, I'm going all in and banning AI use in my studio design courses this semester. Here is my statement I'm adding to my syllabi. #education #design #ai

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brentpatterson@mastodon.art

Descendants

Written by @simplymath on 2025-01-20 at 03:56

@brentpatterson As an AI researcher, I co-sign this policy 100%. Great work!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from simplymath@social.cryptography.dog

Written by @simplymath on 2025-01-20 at 04:21

@brentpatterson I should add-- do not use automated AI detection tools to enforce this policy. They are racist, sexist, and inaccurate. Having students send the raw files rather than the final rendered art should make it very clear who did and did not generate images themselves without relying on these inaccurate tools. Real files will have a history, layers, etc.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from simplymath@social.cryptography.dog

Written by Hiisikoloart on 2025-01-20 at 04:10

@brentpatterson

Hell yea! :D Well said.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hiisikoloart@writing.exchange

Written by Uli Kusterer (Not a kitteh) on 2025-01-20 at 10:45

@brentpatterson Good text & stance. Small suggestion: Reverse the order and start with “undermines the creative process you are attempting to learn”, continue with the Copyright issue, and that you can identify AI art, and only then move on to the ethical issues etc. That way, you get them with enlightened self-interest first, and they might stay and read the rest.

Love that you include that list of AI generators, too. Might help some non-technical people avoid accidentally cheating that way.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from uliwitness@chaos.social