Been asked so many times: “What do you think will happen?”
We will know a lot more soon. But I do think it’s helpful to clarify expectations. The baseline, for me: Being lawless does not make Trump omnipotent. Yet the situation is significantly more dangerous than in 2017.
Wrote this after Nov 5:
🧵
https://thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/why-the-second-trump-regime-will
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
We must resist the temptation to perpetuate Trump’s constant attempts to assert dominance by reflexively despairing over our supposedly hopeless situation. MAGA desires to project power and strength – something we should subvert rather than confirm. Let’s not indulge the false bravado.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
It bears repeating: Being lawless does not make Trump omnipotent – and obscuring that distinction is an act of defeatism that only serves the regime. There is a vast gulf between Trump’s authoritarian aspirations on the one hand and the realities of a complex modern state and society on the other.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Conversely, clinging to the idea that the Trumpists are simply too incompetent to cause any real damage, a clown show not worth taking seriously, won’t cut it either. And I find the notion that the second Trump presidency will mostly be a rerun of the first mostly misleading.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Will the Trump regime’s malevolence yet again be tempered by its rank incompetence? Trump is still erratic and lazy. Many of his nominees are manifestly unqualified. But they are also willing executioners of MAGA extremism - and they will have more competence and preparation around them than in 2016/17.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
I do not find the idea plausible that the regime will simply implement the plans outlined in Project 2025. Then again, the fact that the rightwing machinery of think tanks, lobbying groups, and reactionary intellectuals had years to fully mobilize does make the situation markedly different from Trump One.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
The existence of elaborate plans doesn’t mean there won’t be unforced errors or tremendous chaos. But that is not the same as moderation. Chaos can also accelerate the harm. And in authoritarian movements, frustration and chaos are at least as likely to lead to further radicalization.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
If the recent trajectory of the Right is any indication, every crisis situation only heightens the sense of being under siege that’s animating so much of what is happening on the Right, legitimizing calls to hit harder, more aggressively. There’s always permission to escalate, hardly ever to pull back.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Trump himself and the rightwing forces around him have radicalized significantly over the past fifteen years. He wants revenge, they desire a comprehensive “counter-revolution” – all of them are convinced they were far too timid the first time around. A “mistake” they are unlikely to make again.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Most importantly, the circumstances have changed. Many of the factors that inhibited the extreme Right during the first Trump presidency are no longer present; guardrails that kept the more extreme rightwing factions in check after 2017 have been vastly weakened or destroyed entirely.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
One: The courts played a key role in opposing the radical Right. But Trump can now count on a hard-right 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court. A game changer. And we have never even seen this Court operate with a Republican trifecta - nor a Trumpist regime under conditions of guaranteed immunity.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Two: Trump was also hampered by resistance from within the Republican Party and the conservative movement. But dissenters have largely been ostracized. The Trumpist regime will be able to count on a fully Trumpified party and rightwing machinery of think tanks and activists.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Three: All forms of resistance, regardless of where it emanates or what form it might take, will encounter an unprecedented threat of political violence - condoned and endorsed by all strands of the Right from Trump on down, intended to intimidate anyone who dares to dissent.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Finally, I’d be a lot more optimistic if the nominal opposition party and the institutions ostensibly tasked with defending democratic self-government hadn’t so clearly signaled since the election that they are not in the mood or not able to oppose - instead opting for accommodation and acquiescence.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
Don’t believe for a second the Trumpists will be able to implement everything they have planned or desire to do exactly as they wish. It’s self-defeating. Politics isn’t over.
But they will be operating under conditions that are vastly more favorable to their authoritarian cause.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tzimmer_history@mastodon.social
@tzimmer_history It’s a fallacy to think that the societal collapse fascism seeks to achieve somehow depends on competently executed policy, all within the bounderies of law. None of that holds water.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from js@mastodon.nl
@js @tzimmer_history
I don't think the fascists want societal collapse. They want power and wealth. What happens to society is secondary to that goal. If collapse is necessary, then so be it, but it's not the primary concern.
There ARE factions on the right who want total collapse because they think they can build their utopias from the ashes, but they are not a majority of the coalition.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bruce@darkmoon.social
@bruce @tzimmer_history A functional society has room for neither fascism nor unchecked wealth accumulation. It will have to go.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from js@mastodon.nl
@tzimmer_history All it's going to take is a couple of Dems caving on key issues to give the fascists exactly what they want, and given that many Dems have expressed agreement on some of these issues, we can, for instance, be relatively sure that the attacks on trans rights are going to sail through Congress.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gcvsa@mstdn.plus This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini